2022 "Rainbow Cup" Tianfu Baodao Industrial Design Competition Final Evaluation Site Centralized Evaluation Standards and Rules
To ensure the authority and fairness of the 2022 "Rainbow Cup" Tianfu • Baodao Industrial Design Competition, the organizing committee specially invited design experts, scholars, enterprise executives, and others with professional evaluation experience from domestic (mainland and Taiwan) and foreign industrial design communities to form a preliminary evaluation committee for selection.
1、 Review time and location
Date: November 24, 2022
Location: Xinhua Hotel, Qingyang District (north of Jianghan Road, Xinhua Avenue), No. 29-17 Jianghan Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province
2、 Composition of the Preliminary Evaluation Committee
The final evaluation team consists of 12 judges, including 7 online judges and 5 offline judges.
Offline review of final evaluation: 5 people | |||
Name | Province/Country | unit/duties | title |
Meng Kaining | Sichuan | Dean of the School of Fine Arts and Design, Xihua University; Member of the National Art Foundation Expert Database; Experts in the expert database of the Ministry of Education's industry-university collaborative education project; Director of the National First Class Undergraduate Professional Construction Point (Product Design) under the "Double Ten Thousand Plan" of the Ministry of Education; Reserve candidates for the 13th batch of academic and technical leaders in Sichuan Province; Expert in the evaluation of innovative methods work projects of the Ministry of Science and Technology; Director of the China Industrial Design Association. | professor Doctoral supervisor |
Long Miao | Sichuan | General Manager of Innovation Design Center of Sichuan Changhong Electric Appliance Co., Ltd; Director of Changhong National Design Center and Meiling National Design Center; Received domestic and international design awards such as Red Dot, IF, and Red Star Awards. | senior engineer |
Liu Bin | Sichuan | General Manager of Chengdu Rainbow Electrical Appliances (Group) Co., Ltd | senior engineer |
guan ping | Hubei | Operations Manager of Puxiang Network Led the team to host/collaborate on over 20 domestic and international design competitions, including Red Dot and iF Design Awards | |
Nariman BASHIRI | Sweden | Founder and Chief Designer of Bjorka Design Studio | |
Online review of final review: 7 people | |||
Duan Shengfeng | Chongqing | Vice President of Sichuan Academy of Fine Arts; National level young and middle-aged experts with outstanding contributions; Member of the Teaching Guidance Committee for Design Majors in Higher Education Institutions of the Ministry of Education; Chief Expert of Chongqing Chief Expert Studio (Design); Academic and technical leader in design studies in Chongqing; Selected for the National Hundred and Ten Million Talents Project; The first Chongqing middle-aged and young artists with both moral and artistic excellence. | professor doctoral supervisor |
Sun Li | Hebei | Dean of the School of Art and Design at Yanshan University Person in charge of the national first-class undergraduate professional construction site for industrial design; Chief Expert of Hebei Provincial Design New Think Tank Director of Hebei Intelligent Industrial Design Technology Innovation Center Famous teaching teacher in Hebei Province; Vice Chairman of the Hebei Provincial Art Graduate Education Guidance Committee; Vice Chairman of the First Higher Education Teaching Guidance Committee in Hebei Province. | professor doctoral supervisor
|
Luo Shijian | Zhejiang | Dean of the School of Design, Ningbo Institute of Technology, Zhejiang University; Young scholars under the "Yangtze River Scholar Award Program" of the Ministry of Education; Professor of the "Chutian Scholar Program" at Hubei University; The training targets of the "New Century 151 Talent Project" in Zhejiang Province; Chairman of the User Experience Industry Branch of the China Industrial Design Association; Director of the Chinese Artificial Intelligence Society; Secretary General of the Professional Committee for Intelligent Creativity and Digital Arts; Vice Chairman and Secretary General of Zhejiang Computer Society; Deputy Director and Secretary General of Zhejiang Interactive Design Professional Committee; | professor doctoral supervisor |
Chen Junzhi | Taiwan | Department of Industrial Design, Kaohsiung Normal University Supervisor of CIDA, Taiwan Industrial Design Association; CID Supervisor, Taiwan Design Society; Chairman of the Taiwan Design Cross border Exchange Association. | professor doctoral supervisor |
Dewitt Chik | Hong Kong | Founder and President of the Hong Kong Low Carbon Design Association; Vice Chairman and Director General of the Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area Design, Innovation, Industry and Education Alliance; Founding member and former president of the Hong Kong Industrial Designers Association; Director General of WGDO World Green Design Organization in Hong Kong; Vice Chairman of the Silk Road Innovation Design Industry Alliance. | |
Wang Lan | Macao | School of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology; Director of the Macau Art Association; Director of the Macau Urban Society; Vice President of the Macau Chinese Painting Graduate Creative Research Association; Vice President of the Shanghai Australia Economic and Cultural Development Association; Director of the Professional Committee for Chinese Calligraphy and Painting Talents; Member of the French Society of SPEDIDAM. | professor doctoral supervisor |
Arnault Garcia | France | President of the AFD | |
3、 Work classification
The works are divided into 8 categories: equipment manufacturing, medical and health, digital intelligent information, consumer boutiques, rural revitalization design, furniture and home furnishings, cultural and creative products, and Future Star.
4、 Review criteria
（1） Overall standard (total score of 100 points)
Innovation (20 points) | Is the design concept forward-looking; The level of innovation in functionality, structure, technology, form, materials, craftsmanship, and ecology. |
Feasibility (20 points) | Is the work itself feasible; Is the feasibility analysis of the technical structure in this work in place. |
Scientificity and Social Value (20 points) | Whether the structural design and technical application are reasonable and exquisite; Consider positive benefits for society and ecology. |
Aesthetics (20 points) | Color and appearance have visual appeal and appropriate aesthetics; Can the work express a sense of the times and a positive social outlook. |
Achievement display (20 points) | Can you fully and accurately display the characteristics and functions of the work. Note: 1. The score for achievements such as prototypes, physical models, and physical software in the work shall not be less than 15 points (according to the evaluation, providing videos and images for large equipment that cannot be displayed is considered as having physical models) 2. Entries that only provide videos must not exceed 10 points (except in special circumstances) 3. Entries that only provide images shall not exceed 5 points (except in special circumstances). 4. Entries that do not provide physical models, videos, or images shall not be scored. 5. The Future Star category is not limited by rules 1-4 and is determined by the judges themselves. |
（2） Classification Description
1. Equipment manufacturing
Mining, water conservancy, rail transit and other engineering equipment and equipment; Construction machinery and infrastructure equipment; Basic components of major technical equipment; Environmental protection and resource comprehensive utilization equipment; Civil aircraft, ships, automobiles, internal and external parts of locomotives, industrial specialized vehicles, motorcycles, bicycles, and other transportation equipment; Industrial tools and molds; Walls, floors, etc.
2. Medical and Health
Clinical and diagnostic products; Rehabilitation products; Surgical and therapeutic products; Home care products; Personal care products, etc.
3. Digital intelligent information products
Virtual design such as VR and MR; Product design; UI service design; Internet products, etc; Electronic products.
4. Consumer boutique products
Jewelry category; Fashion consumption category; Footwear; Alcohol, etc; Daily necessities, etc.
5. Rural revitalization design
Overall solution for rural revitalization; Fine processing and redesign of agricultural and sideline products; Agricultural and sideline product brand design, etc.
6. Furniture and Home Furnishings
Furniture category; Home furnishings; Bathroom fixtures; Kitchen supplies; Household appliances; Interior design, etc.
7. Cultural and creative categories
Red cultural and creative products; Tourist attractions and industrial heritage creative products; Museums (cultural relics) creative design category; Practical product creative design category; Cultural and creative supplies, etc.
8. Future Star Class
Concept class; Works of college students, undergraduate students, and graduate students (including fresh graduates and current students).
5、 Competition Evaluation Rules
The evaluation of works is based on the "completeness" of the submitted work materials, and based on the theme of the competition, the participating works are selected one by one according to evaluation indicators such as "innovation, feasibility, scientificity and social value, aesthetics, and achievement display".
All judges will grasp the correct direction, adhere to the principles of fairness, impartiality, and openness, strictly adhere to the evaluation procedures, abide by the evaluation methods, and create a clean and upright competition style and discipline. The rules for evaluation are as follows:
（1） Review method (unified and divided)
1. A total of 216 works were selected for the final evaluation on-site centralized selection;
2. The evaluation experts rate the work based on the evaluation criteria and fill in the corresponding table with the scores.
3. The total score of the final evaluation shall not be less than 60 points.
（2） Rating Award Evaluation Rules
1. Select award-winning works based on their scores.
2. From the seven categories of equipment manufacturing, medical and health, digital intelligent information, consumer boutiques, rural revitalization design, furniture and home furnishings, and cultural and creative products, one gold medal, two silver medals, and three bronze medals will be selected in descending order of online and offline scoring scores based on this category.
3. Among the seven categories mentioned above, fresh graduates and current students from universities who have submitted works that have not won the level award can continue to participate in the Future Star selection. If they have not won the level award, they can return to their original category or stay at Future Star to receive the Excellence Award.
4. According to the online and offline rating scores of Huibusi, the Future Star category will be selected from high to low, with four gold awards, six silver awards, and eight bronze awards.
5. The works in the eight categories mentioned above that have not received level awards will receive the Excellence Award, with a total of 160 outstanding awards.
6. The online evaluation results shall be verified by the online final evaluation committee and sent to the designated email. The offline evaluation results shall be signed and confirmed by the offline evaluation committee after verification. Finally, the online and offline ratings will be summarized to obtain the ranking of this competition. The offline judges will review and sign their names, and the leader of the final evaluation committee will make a written summary of this evaluation work, which will be submitted to the competition organizing committee for archiving and preservation.
6、 Result publicity:
The award-winning works will be publicly displayed on the official website of the competition after being impartial by the impartial personnel.